Skip to main content

“Hurts”

I was watching the third Guardians of the Galaxy movie the other day. A bit late to the party to be sure, as I always am when it comes to movies, and I guess maybe I was in a certain mood or state of mind or what have you, because the animal abuse scenes in it made me think about a lot of things. And while there are quite a few of those scenes, the main one for me is, as it is also often the case when it comes to movies, a small one, it is a small detail, a specific and very singular moment. Then again it might not be as insignificant as all that, in great movies the details never are. A lot of thought and work is placed behind all things, and maybe a lot of meaning too, and so now I'm left wondering if I'm on to something or if I'm overthinking everything, or if maybe in a few words time I'll reconsider, and then rewrite, and then delete, this entire page. And the thing in question would be Rocket's very first word, a short and simple word that doesn't even make for an entire correct sentence, a word that was so difficult for him to say but so easy for everyone, all jews and all gentiles of all nations, to understand. And that word was – Hurts.


Trent Reznor, and then later on Johnny Cash, did something similar. That is to say they took that word, although minus one letter, and wrote a whole song about it. Cash's version was so powerful that Reznor himself said his song had been taken over, now rightfully belonging to its new master. The lyrics are very sad and moving, and at times quite metaphorical too, but the title, the operative word, it's just so forceful and biting and universal, and indeed, it's probably the universal experience common to all living things, namely this unique capacity to suffer, this capacity to feel hurt. It is as universal as it is universally avoided, and in the context of the lyrics it is even avoided when someone is accidentally doing the hurting to someone else. You might then intuitively say that the hurt is quite simply, and with no need for fancy philosophies, the bad thing at the end of all things.

And you could have it all,
My empire of dirt.
I will let you down,
I will make you hurt.

“I will make you hurt” is one hell of a thing to say to anybody... It's simple and almost ungrammatical but it sure gets the point across, very bluntly too. I'm not really sure if the High Evolutionary says those words at any point in the movie, maybe he does or maybe he doesn't. But regardless of his actual words, what matters is that he does something to that effect, inflicting onto Rocket and countless other animals all manner of hurt. And so when we await to hear Rocket's first word we see he's being pushed into his jail cell for what will be to him a much needed rest, now with bits of his fur shaved to reveal some of his pink skin, all sore and bruised and raw, with fresh stitch lines all over his body, shivering with fear and the existential strangeness of being thrown into such a dark place, of suddenly realizing that he exists in desperate conditions. The hurt has thus been made flesh, and only then does Rocket make flesh into word.

But it's just a movie!... You might say that, and I might say it too because it occurred to me as well. In fact, I left a note about it, or rather I wrote down the word “manipulation” and left it all alone because I figured I'd know what to say about it when I got around to its due paragraph. And yeah, you could say in part there's some of that. After all, it is a movie with lots of computer-generated characters, what with their big eyes, their all too human voices, their mannerisms and personalities. In that sense I suppose everything is carefully made so as to elicit empathy, even from a fella like me... But is a movie ever just a movie? Is a song ever just a song? Is a book ever just a book? No, I shouldn't think so, or if I were to think so then I'd realize I wasted more of my life than I thought and I'd then lose myself in a big nothing... In this particular case it occurs to me that I'm on to something, and I know now that this singular moment has been noticed by more people than just me. And apparently, if the feeling of hurt is universal, then the feeling of empathy appears to be universal as well, although at times it is more strangely hidden and therefore harder to understand.

That universality, however, is easy to find, as this precise moment of Rocket's first word has been noticed by millions of people, but the actual, real, pragmatic empathy towards it is sorely lacking. That is because in this very moment there are countless animals just like Rocket in very similar situations. Maybe they don't speak that word, maybe they lack some awareness of exactly where they are or what they can do to escape, maybe they don't look quite the same way and they don't have quite the same humanity... but they do have the same capacity to suffer. And if we can gleam the reality of suffering somewhere from within a fictional character, quite as if that suffering is real because in a sense it almost is, then why do we struggle to hold on to that empathy towards a real creature, though one who is far away and hidden from us? For all the real animals alive now in this world, if they could speak they'd speak that selfsame word in almost the exact same way. Still, the craziest thing here is that they do speak, and they do speak that same word, just in a different language. So why aren't we going out of our way to hear it? Or why aren't we as keen on empathy towards them as we are towards a character in a movie?

I suppose in many ways the greatest cruelty of suffering is it very often being needless, and so if it isn't needless then it can be stomached more adequately, it can be chewed and swallowed and digested. So then it becomes a matter of practicality – some people staunchly defend that this kind of suffering is needless and must stop, other people defend it as necessity and it therefore must be continued, and other people just don't care either way. As for me I'm not so sure what I defend. In some measure it does seem necessary to me, while at the same time it is quite obvious that at least a whole lot of it isn't. For example, the flesh of baby pigs cannot possibly be a physical necessity, to you, to me or to anybody, so all those baby pigs that were eaten today were brought into this world in a steel cage, they stayed there for their entire brief life, in pain and confusion, and then they were killed and served on a plate. It makes for a sad story, almost sadder than the one in the movie, but more than it being sad per se it's just bizarre... We live in a world where suffering is seemingly inevitable, true, but we also live in a world where we often go out of our way to perpetuate suffering, and then we ignore it, at least until we are faced with the its immediacy, and the equally inevitable despair of all creatures as they struggle to avoid it, doing whatever they can in a helpless situation.

Rocket, Teefs, Floor go now! Rocket, Teefs, Floor go now! Rocket, Teefs, Floor go now!

Thing is, not all of it is that inevitable, and a whole lot of it is simply unnecessary, and so if most of us have been made in such a way as to have a strong sense of empathy towards suffering, then why does suffering still exist in such large measures? Why has curiosity led so many to hurt so many others? You might say at the end of all hurt there is a good reason, a proper cause, a meaning that justifies all things. Maybe a lot of that meaning exists in the world, though it is rather opaque and obscure, but it does exist in a story. I suppose you might say it was always Rocket's destiny to endure that hurt and to carry on because he'd become a leader, a hero, so that one day that hurt he felt would have meant something. For him it is true, even if in a more boring sense it isn't true because he doesn't really exist... But regardless, what about all the animals for whom that wasn't true? What about all those instances of hurt that these creatures had to endure in their bodies? It is almost permanent and continuous, it's not always so easy to know that an animal is currently suffering, that his or her bones and flesh and skin are right now, in this very moment, currently and continuously aching. We might air on the side of doubt, we might assume it's not that bad or else it would have been made more obvious to us, maybe the animal was in some pain for a bit but it's all over now, it doesn't linger... So when this raccoon was thrown into a jail cell and trembled to mutter the word, we realized that since we can't turn back time, we better believe this suffering wasn't in vain, we better believe in some form of redemption, and in a very singular purpose to justify it.

My beloved raccoon... The story has been yours all along, you just didn't know it.

In this sense, like with a whole lot of things, if there's no ultimate justification for suffering in this world, then even one instance of it is enough to void and invalidate the whole thing and make us want to start over, or maybe not even that... Therefore if there's no guiding purpose at the center of it all then all instances of hurting have thus been made senseless. On the other hand, if there is such a purpose then maybe we can rest easy, but just a little, because regardless of that purpose it still rings as a loud and universal truth that if anything can be said to be bad it would be suffering. We don't need to love animals, we don't need to love raccoons, we don't even need to love this one raccoon in particular to know that when he's hurting it is factually true that something unpleasant is currently taking place in this world, and that it most definitely shouldn't be, and that it therefore should be stopped. And if it's well within our power to stop it, then maybe we should. Because if our hearts should break in sorrow, and if they should stop and cry and remember the suffering, then maybe our hands should do a little something about it.

Now as for me I don't really know. I am making no arguments, I am mostly rambling on until I wear myself out, rambling away these thoughts onto a page so they don't chase me as much anymore. And these thoughts are that my heart broke for a fake raccoon, in a movie I didn't expect to love so much or to think about as often. Now that I have, even though I feel as though I failed to write with any proper coherence, I'm left wholly dissatisfied, I feel as though a lot was left unsaid but I can't say it any better now. But maybe the reason is because this suffering, this hurting, it's all so intuitive as to not warrant much of an explanation. It's simple to pinpoint suffering because it has been made obviously felt, and for most of us, at times myself included, it has been made into an obvious thing to share in as well. Because even with all empathy aside, the true meaning of compassion has never quite been to share feelings, to be understanding and to offer some kind words. No, the true meaning of compassion has always been to suffer with, because after that hurt has been delivered it can be stopped or lessened, sure, but it can never be truly taken back. I suppose nobody has that power, people least of all. What has been delivered unto the flesh has now been made a permanent memory, even if it is ever forgotten, and so in our weakness we might at times resort to compassion, we might at times willingly choose to suffer a little bit of it as well. So does that mean we should volunteer to suffer horrific tortures as well for the sake of a beastly raccoon? No, maybe not, or maybe yes for all I know. But to at least allow for your heart to break, oh so willingly, as you witness it... yes, maybe that is worth something, maybe it's not as useless as all that.

I suppose not all bad things necessarily entail hurting, I wouldn't go there because it leads some to conclude that those who can't quite feel are less worthy, but it does seem obvious that all hurting, and all needless hurting, is in fact a bad thing. And so for how many more paragraphs will I keep insisting on the obvious? I feel as though I should just leave it, but the compassionate experience of suffering is maybe worthwhile to talk about, and to end on. Because every little detail of a suffering creature is delivered unto us like a fleshy shadow of the suffering itself. Every detail is etched onto our eyes, every twitch, every shiver, every sensation on every sensitive piece of flesh, all of it lasting forever, even if only for a brief moment, because when you hurt it's as if the sky falls on you and you come to find that the scope of all existence has been zeroed in on your head, your eyes, your teeth, your belly, your back, and because when one thing hurts so much it's as if all others do too, then even your everything hurts, it hurts all over... So whenever it hurts let it be swift, and when someone else hurts try to make it stop, or then lessen it, or then hurt yourself along with it. And then when it's all over, make sure none of it was in vain, build something nice on top of it all, and begin again, like it's the first day of the rest of your life.

Someday I'm gonna make great machines that fly. And me and my friends are gonna go flyin' together, into the forever and beautiful sky. Lyla, and Teefs, and Floor, and me... Rocket.

Comments

Popular posts

A Minha Interpretação Pessoal de “Às Vezes, em Sonho Triste” de Fernando Pessoa

Já há muito tempo que não lia nada que o Fernando Pessoa escreveu, e talvez por esse motivo, mas principalmente porque buscava ideias sobre as quais escrever aqui, decidi folhear um livro de poemas dele. E enquanto o fiz, tomei especial nota das marcas que apontei na margem de algumas páginas, significando alguns poemas que gostei quando os li pela primeira vez, há cerca de sete anos atrás. Poderia ter escolhido um poema mais nostálgico ou até mais famoso, mas ao folhear por todo o livro foi este o poema que me fez mais sentido escolher. Agora leio e releio estes versos e comprometo-me a tecer algo que não me atreverei a chamar de análise, porque não sou poeta nem crítico de poesia. Mas como qualquer outro estudante português, fui leitor de Fernando Pessoa e, ainda que talvez mais a uns Fernandos Pessoas do que a outros, devo a este homem um bom pedaço dos frutos da minha escrita, que até à data são poucos ou nenhuns. Mas enfim, estou a divagar... O que queria dizer a jeito de introduç...

Meditations on The Caretaker's “Everywhere at the End of Time”

I have always been sentimental about memory. Nostalgia was surely one of the first big boy words I learned. And all throughout my life I sort of developed a strong attachment memory, and subsequently to things, which became an obsession almost. I never wanted to see them go, even if they had lost any and all useful purpose, because they still retained a strong emotional attachment to me. I had a memory forever entwined with those old things, so I never wanted to see them go. However, in my late teens I realized I was being stupid, I realized there was no memory within the object itself, it was only in me. So I started to throw a bunch of stuff out, I went from a borderline hoarder to a borderline minimalist, and it was pretty good. I came to the realization that all things were inherently temporary. No matter how long I held on to them, eventually I would lose them one way or another, and if someone or some thing were to forcefully take them from me, I would be heartbroken beyond repai...

10 Atheist Arguments I No Longer Defend

I don't believe in God, I don't follow any religion. And yet, there was a time in my life when I could have said to be more of an atheist than I am now. In some ways I contributed to the new atheism movement, and in fact, for a little while there, Christopher Hitchens was my lord and savior. I greatly admired his extensive literary knowledge, his eloquence, his wit and his bravery. But now I've come to realize his eloquence was his double-edged sword, and because he criticized religion mostly from an ethics standpoint, greatly enhanced by his journalism background, some of the more philosophical questions and their implications were somewhat forgotten, or even dealt with in a little bit of sophistry. And now it's sad that he died... I for one would have loved to know what he would have said in these times when atheism seems to have gained territory, and yet people are deeply craving meaning and direction in their lives. In a nutshell, I think Hitchens versus Peterson wo...

Mármore

Dá-me a mão e vem comigo. Temos tantos lugares para ver. Era assim que escrevia o Bernardo numa página à parte, em pleno contraste com tantas outras páginas soltas e enamoradas de ilustrações coloridas, nas quais eram inteligíveis as suas várias tentativas de idealizar uma rapariga de cabelo castanho-claro, ou talvez vermelho, e com uns olhos grandes que pareciam evocar uma aura de mistério e de aventura, e com os braços estendidos na sua frente, terminando em mãos delicadas que se enlaçavam uma à outra, como se as suas palmas fossem uma concha do mar que guarda uma pérola imperfeita, como se cuidasse de um pássaro caído que tem pena de libertar, como se desafiasse um gesto tímido... Mas tal criação ficava sempre aquém daquilo que o Bernardo visualizava na sua mente. Na verdade não passava sequer de um protótipo mas havia algo ali, uma intenção, uma faísca com tanto potencial para deflagrar no escuro da página branca... se porventura ele fosse melhor artista. E embora a obra carecesse ...

A Synopsis Breakdown of “The Wandering King”

A collection of eight different short stories set in a world where the malignant and omniscient presence of the Wandering King is felt throughout, leading its inhabitants down a spiral of violence, paranoia and madness. That is my book's brief synopsis. And that is just how I like to keep it – brief and vague. I for one find that plot-oriented synopses often ruin the whole reading, or viewing, experience. For example, if you were to describe The Godfather as the story of an aging mafia don who, upon suffering a violent attempt on his life, is forced to transfer control of his crime family to his mild-mannered son, you have already spoiled half the movie. You have given away that Sollozzo is far more dangerous than he appears to be, you have given away that the Don survives the attempt, and you have given away that Michael is the one who will succeed him... Now, it could well be that some stories cannot be, or should not be, captured within a vague description. It could also be t...

In Defense of Ang Lee's “Hulk”

This movie isn't particularly well-liked, that much is no secret. People seem to dislike how odd and bizarrely subdued it is, especially considering the explosive nature of its titular superhero. In a nutshell, people find this movie boring. The criticism I most often hear is that it is essentially a very pretentious take on the Incredible Hulk, an ego-driven attempt to come up with some deep psychological meaning behind a green giant who smashes things. And it's tempting to agree, in a sense it's tempting to brush it off as pretentious and conclude that a film about the Hulk that fails to deliver two action-packed hours is an automatic failure. But of course, I disagree. Even when I was a kid and went into the cinema with my limited knowledge, but great appreciation, of the comics, I never saw the Hulk as a jolly green giant. At one point, the character was seen as a mere physical manifestation of Bruce Banner's repressed anger awakened by gamma radiation, but eventual...

Meditações sobre “Em Busca do Tempo Perdido I – Do Lado de Swann”

Estou a ler Marcel Proust pela segunda vez... Há quem diga que é comum da parte dos seus leitores iniciarem uma segunda leitura logo após a tortura que é a primeira. Quanto a mim posso dizer que seja esse o caso. Quando li este primeiro volume pela primeira vez decidi que não tinha interesse em ler os outros seis, mas depois mudei de ideias e li-os. Mas li quase como que só para poder dizer ter lido. Então o objetivo seria não mais pensar no livro mas isso afigurou-se estranhamente impossível. Surgia uma crescente curiosidade em ler sínteses ou resumos e ficava-me sempre aquela surpresa depois de ler sobre um acontecimento do qual já não tinha memória. Por isso é que me proponho agora a uma segunda e muito, muito mais demorada leitura, para que possa compreender o livro pelo menos o suficiente para dizer qualquer coisa interessante sobre ele. Em relação ao título deste artigo, do qual planeio fazer uma série, decidi usar o termo que usei porque nenhum outro me pareceu mais correto. Nã...

The Gospel According to Dragline

Yeah, well... sometimes the Gospel can be a real cool book. I'm of course referencing the 1967 classic Cool Hand Luke, one of my favorite films of all time. And, as it is often the case with me, this is a film I didn't really care for upon first viewing. Now I obviously think differently. In many ways, this is a movie made beautiful by it's simplicity. It is made visually striking by its backdrop of natural southern beauty in the US – the everlasting summer, the seemingly abandoned train tracks and the long dirt roads, almost fully deserted were it not for the prisoners working by the fields... It almost gives off the impression that there is no world beyond that road. And maybe as part of that isolation, the story doesn't shy away from grit. It is dirty, grimy and hence, it is real. Some modern movies seem to have an obsession with polishing every pixel of every frame, thus giving off a distinct sense of falsehood. The movie then becomes too colorful, too vibrant, it...

A Minha Interpretação Pessoal de “Sou um Guardador de Rebanhos” de Alberto Caeiro

Em continuação com o meu artigo anterior, comprometo-me agora a uma interpretação de um outro poema do mesmo poeta... mais ou menos. Porque os vários heterónimos pessoanos são todos iguais e diferentes, e diferentes e iguais. Qualquer leitor encontra temas recorrentes nos vários poemas porque de certa forma todos estes poetas se propuseram a resolver as mesmas questões que tanto atormentavam o poeta original. Mas a solução encontrada por Alberto Caeiro é algo diferente na medida em que é quase invejável ao próprio Fernando Pessoa, ainda que talvez não seja invejável aos outros heterónimos. Por outro lado, talvez eu esteja a projetar porque em tempos esta poesia foi deveras invejável para mim. Ao contrário do poema anterior, do qual nem sequer tinha memória de ter lido e apenas sei que o li porque anotei marcas e sublinhados na margem da página, este poema é um que li, que gostei e que apresentei numa aula qualquer num dia que me vem agora à memória como idílico. Mas em típico estilo d...

Martha, You've Been on My Mind

Perhaps it is the color of this gray rainy sky at the end of spring, this cold but soothing day I hoped would be warm, bright and the end of something I gotta carry on. Or maybe it's that I'm thinking of old days to while away the time until new days come along. Perhaps it's all that or it's nothing at all, but Martha, you've been on my mind. I wouldn't dare to try and find you or even write to you, so instead I write about you, about who I think you are, because in truth I don't really know you. To me you're just a memory, a good memory though, and more importantly, you're the very first crossroads in my life. I had no free will before I saw you and chose what I chose... Two roads diverged in a yellow wood, you would have led me down one, and yet I chose the other. But I never stopped looking down your chosen path for as long as I could, and for a fleeting moment I could have sworn I saw you standing there, and then you just faded, almost as if you ...