Skip to main content

George Lucas Is Right When He Says Art Is Never Finished

Attributing quotes to artists is a risky business. Even as I began to write this article I was immediately confused by my research and became very unsure of what Lucas actually said. It appears he was actually quoting someone else before him, which made me realize a lot of artists agree with what I'm about to say – George Lucas in cinema, Oscar Wilde in writing, and Pablo Picasso in painting. However, and regardless of the confusing quote game, I had Lucas on my mind for a little while now, and that is because he is famously known for going back to Star Wars and reediting it with new technology. Some changes, in all fields of art, can be minor and tame, such as merely improving upon the special effects, enhancing the picture quality, or, in the case of writing, correcting a few slips of the pen. But then again, some changes can be big enough to make us rethink the whole thing. Indeed, a quick search for additions and changes in Star Wars reveals a list far bigger than what I first had in mind... I remembered some additions of alien beasts and new tech as background elements, I remembered the infamous CGI Jabba, the Ewok celebration music, the Greedo controversy and, perhaps most noticeable of all, the inclusion of Hayden Christensen in Return of the Jedi. Because while some changes can be merely aesthetic or corrective of minor mistakes, this one purposes a legitimate question about the story – when did Anakin Skywalker really die? If he died after being defeated by Obi-Wan then Christensen's inclusion makes some kind of sense, but that would then seem to suggest Vader wasn't redeemed by Luke at the end, and thus Luke never did get to see his father's face...


I dunno and it don't matter. My point is that art is never truly finished. Artists simply get to a point where they have to share their work with the world and move on... Some works of art may well be more finished than others though. Franz Kafka's Metamorphosis appears to be whole and complete, but sadly, some of his other works, such as The Castle, certainly aren't. With Marcel Proust's In Search of Lost Time, though we got seven volumes, the last one seems incomplete as well, and considering the numerous changes and additions Proust would make, it seems likely that, were he immortal, he would still be writing the book to this very day. On the other hand, William Faulkner claimed As I Lay Dying was concluded to the absolute limit of his inspiration, and that after finishing it, he didn't add a single letter to it, which may or may not be true. Regardless, it does seem to be the case that some works of art are more complete than others, but can we really say that any of them really is wholly complete? To explore that question I'd like to be able to focus on painting or music but, for the purposes of this essay, and due to my lack of talent in those other areas, I can only talk about writing.

At the time of this article I have written two books and forty-two blog posts, not counting this same one. When it comes to my books, I quickly found the writing process to be strange... I would stare at the blank page for hours, I'd let my mind wander free and, most of the time, hours would go by and I wouldn't write a single word. But when I would write, even pages on end at times, I would afterwards feel I had made tremendous progress and that I had written some pretty neat stuff. But then, sometimes months or even years later, I would reread it and it all positively sucked. That's when I knew my books would have to be saved in editing. The way I describe it, the initial writing process is quite literally placing the bare-bones ideas onto the page, it's more about exteriorizing the basic structure of the story, thereby building its skeleton. Then on the first sessions of editing I'd find some structural errors such as paragraphs that needed to be deleted, paragraphs that need to be added, paragraphs that needed to be changed around, characters that needed to be merged, characters that needed to be deleted, characters that needed to be improved, and so on. Because that still involves quite a bit of structure, I'd say that this phase is about adding the organs and muscles onto the skeleton. And after that comes what is perhaps the best phase, although it's one that can cause a whole lot of anxiety... I'd read my manuscript almost like I would read a normal book but I'd change little bits here and there, trying to make the text as clear as possible when clarity was needed, and as beautiful as possible when beauty was needed. You probably guessed by now that, according to metaphor, this last phase is about placing the skin over the organs and muscles, thereby making it presentable and concluding the complete body of work. And with my blog posts it's a very similar thing, only much faster and less worrisome because I write here in a much looser style, in fact, I at times try to make it similar to a conversation or even a rant.

But still, when I look back on my writing, I often catch myself thinking about it, second-guessing myself, wondering if a character's line was left unsaid, if a clear sentence could have been more clear, if an eloquent sentence could have been more eloquent, if a word could have been swapped for a better one. Because I mean, my first book has ninety-one thousand words and my second one has a hundred thousand... Can I really claim that every single one of those words is the best possible one, and that they are all strung together in the best possible combination? Of course I can't, the possibilities are endless. It's just that, when the skeleton is built in such a way, our possibilities become limited, but that limitation is actually a good thing. Because a blank page, though full of possibility, is also barren of everything. It's like that bit in Neon Genesis Evangelion when Shinji, by being completely free, exists without the possibility to do anything at all, but when he is limited by gravity, he can at least walk.

So my books and my blog posts are out there, and though very few copies have been purchased, the sad truth is that there are different versions already. Some are very stupid formatting mistakes on my end, while others are very minor changes I had to make when correcting those same mistakes. And that means that already, in a book with only one writer and like ten existing print copies, there are already textual variants... Isn't that something? But I suppose no one will care enough to discover them, and in truth, a lot of books have them. Some manuscripts contain multiple options for any given word, and since the author died before publication, it's up to editors to decide on the best one, or to even fill in the blanks, when they come across them. But that's not a problem only when the author dies... Our Lucas is alive and well, and he still goes back to his own work, almost obsessively, and adds to it or changes it. I have to admit I only don't fall into the same rabbit hole because I refrain from looking too closely at my own books. For if I do, I'll end up editing the whole thing from beginning to end, thereby creating yet another “perfect” version.

Because that is precisely the feeling I got when editing. I remember after finishing my first book I was faced with a mess of raw text, numerous and confusing notes detailing what should happen in missing paragraphs, underdeveloped characters, plot holes and all that. But when I soldiered on through the text and came out on the other end I felt I had really accomplished something, I felt I had perfected the text to the very best of my ability. Then a few days later I'd do the same thing and I'd have to correct a ton of other stuff, now feeling like a total moron because somehow I didn't catch those mistakes on my first run. And then again, and again, and again... I decided on editing my books five times plus one before considering them finished. Five because it's a nice, round number, and the extra round is just to give it the finishing touches, usually after having formatted the text. Of course on my first two books I didn't exactly do it that way, I was still making it up as I went along. As far as my method went, they were sort of prototypes, I suppose... With my blog posts I decided on three times plus one, for the same reasons.

But even so, are those times sufficient? And as they are now, are my books really complete? Couldn't I improve on them just a little bit more? I think I could because after a while I can always return to my writing with fresh eyes and I can find more mistakes or ugly bits, or I just learn something new in the meantime that makes me feel tempted to squeeze it into the book. With my blog posts that may be easier, I can always sneak in and give it a little edit, but with the books does that make sense? Would it be at all wise to create a ton of different versions? If so that would create the obvious search for the definitive one, which might actually not even exist. And even without variations, can a definitive version of any work of art really exist? Couldn't Starry Night or Stairway to Heaven be better, even if just a little bit? I for one can't see any room for improvement but that's just because I can't draw a stick figure nor can I hold a tune, but I'm fairly certain their respective makers might at the very least wonder about this detail or that one...

Going back to our titular artist, I suppose the constant advent of new technology adds a strong temptation to go back and improve, a temptation that's already there and can be quite powerful unless new ideas come along. For now I resist it because I do have new ideas and that's why I don't dwell too much on my past writing. But the question still remains – how do I know if my books are out there, having been written in the best possible form they can ever take? I suppose I can't, I just have to rely on my eventual readers being far less critical than me, I have to rely on them reading every word as it is and not as it could have been. But all the while I have to reiterate that art is never finished, it could always be better, even if only in the tiny details. I just hope my eventual readers know that, though I inevitably failed, I really did try.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Minha Interpretação Pessoal de “Às Vezes, em Sonho Triste” de Fernando Pessoa

Já há muito tempo que não lia nada que o Fernando Pessoa escreveu, e talvez por esse motivo, mas principalmente porque buscava ideias sobre as quais escrever aqui, decidi folhear um livro de poemas dele. E enquanto o fiz, tomei especial nota das marcas que apontei na margem de algumas páginas, significando alguns poemas que gostei quando os li pela primeira vez, há cerca de sete anos atrás. Poderia ter escolhido um poema mais nostálgico ou até mais famoso, mas ao folhear por todo o livro foi este o poema que me fez mais sentido escolher. Agora leio e releio estes versos e comprometo-me a tecer algo que não me atreverei a chamar de análise, porque não sou poeta nem crítico de poesia. Mas como qualquer outro estudante português, fui leitor de Fernando Pessoa e, ainda que talvez mais a uns Fernandos Pessoas do que a outros, devo a este homem um bom pedaço dos frutos da minha escrita, que até à data são poucos ou nenhuns. Mas enfim, estou a divagar... O que queria dizer a jeito de introduç...

Meditations on The Caretaker's “Everywhere at the End of Time”

I have always been sentimental about memory. Nostalgia was surely one of the first big boy words I learned. And all throughout my life I sort of developed a strong attachment memory, and subsequently to things, which became an obsession almost. I never wanted to see them go, even if they had lost any and all useful purpose, because they still retained a strong emotional attachment to me. I had a memory forever entwined with those old things, so I never wanted to see them go. However, in my late teens I realized I was being stupid, I realized there was no memory within the object itself, it was only in me. So I started to throw a bunch of stuff out, I went from a borderline hoarder to a borderline minimalist, and it was pretty good. I came to the realization that all things were inherently temporary. No matter how long I held on to them, eventually I would lose them one way or another, and if someone or some thing were to forcefully take them from me, I would be heartbroken beyond repai...

10 Atheist Arguments I No Longer Defend

I don't believe in God, I don't follow any religion. And yet, there was a time in my life when I could have said to be more of an atheist than I am now. In some ways I contributed to the new atheism movement, and in fact, for a little while there, Christopher Hitchens was my lord and savior. I greatly admired his extensive literary knowledge, his eloquence, his wit and his bravery. But now I've come to realize his eloquence was his double-edged sword, and because he criticized religion mostly from an ethics standpoint, greatly enhanced by his journalism background, some of the more philosophical questions and their implications were somewhat forgotten, or even dealt with in a little bit of sophistry. And now it's sad that he died... I for one would have loved to know what he would have said in these times when atheism seems to have gained territory, and yet people are deeply craving meaning and direction in their lives. In a nutshell, I think Hitchens versus Peterson wo...

Mármore

Dá-me a mão e vem comigo. Temos tantos lugares para ver. Era assim que escrevia o Bernardo numa página à parte, em pleno contraste com tantas outras páginas soltas e enamoradas de ilustrações coloridas, nas quais eram inteligíveis as suas várias tentativas de idealizar uma rapariga de cabelo castanho-claro, ou talvez vermelho, e com uns olhos grandes que pareciam evocar uma aura de mistério e de aventura, e com os braços estendidos na sua frente, terminando em mãos delicadas que se enlaçavam uma à outra, como se as suas palmas fossem uma concha do mar que guarda uma pérola imperfeita, como se cuidasse de um pássaro caído que tem pena de libertar, como se desafiasse um gesto tímido... Mas tal criação ficava sempre aquém daquilo que o Bernardo visualizava na sua mente. Na verdade não passava sequer de um protótipo mas havia algo ali, uma intenção, uma faísca com tanto potencial para deflagrar no escuro da página branca... se porventura ele fosse melhor artista. E embora a obra carecesse ...

A Synopsis Breakdown of “The Wandering King”

A collection of eight different short stories set in a world where the malignant and omniscient presence of the Wandering King is felt throughout, leading its inhabitants down a spiral of violence, paranoia and madness. That is my book's brief synopsis. And that is just how I like to keep it – brief and vague. I for one find that plot-oriented synopses often ruin the whole reading, or viewing, experience. For example, if you were to describe The Godfather as the story of an aging mafia don who, upon suffering a violent attempt on his life, is forced to transfer control of his crime family to his mild-mannered son, you have already spoiled half the movie. You have given away that Sollozzo is far more dangerous than he appears to be, you have given away that the Don survives the attempt, and you have given away that Michael is the one who will succeed him... Now, it could well be that some stories cannot be, or should not be, captured within a vague description. It could also be t...

Martha, You've Been on My Mind

Perhaps it is the color of this gray rainy sky at the end of spring, this cold but soothing day I hoped would be warm, bright and the end of something I gotta carry on. Or maybe it's that I'm thinking of old days to while away the time until new days come along. Perhaps it's all that or it's nothing at all, but Martha, you've been on my mind. I wouldn't dare to try and find you or even write to you, so instead I write about you, about who I think you are, because in truth I don't really know you. To me you're just a memory, a good memory though, and more importantly, you're the very first crossroads in my life. I had no free will before I saw you and chose what I chose... Two roads diverged in a yellow wood, you would have led me down one, and yet I chose the other. But I never stopped looking down your chosen path for as long as I could, and for a fleeting moment I could have sworn I saw you standing there, and then you just faded, almost as if you ...

In Defense of Ang Lee's “Hulk”

This movie isn't particularly well-liked, that much is no secret. People seem to dislike how odd and bizarrely subdued it is, especially considering the explosive nature of its titular superhero. In a nutshell, people find this movie boring. The criticism I most often hear is that it is essentially a very pretentious take on the Incredible Hulk, an ego-driven attempt to come up with some deep psychological meaning behind a green giant who smashes things. And it's tempting to agree, in a sense it's tempting to brush it off as pretentious and conclude that a film about the Hulk that fails to deliver two action-packed hours is an automatic failure. But of course, I disagree. Even when I was a kid and went into the cinema with my limited knowledge, but great appreciation, of the comics, I never saw the Hulk as a jolly green giant. At one point, the character was seen as a mere physical manifestation of Bruce Banner's repressed anger awakened by gamma radiation, but eventual...

Meditações sobre “Em Busca do Tempo Perdido I – Do Lado de Swann”

Estou a ler Marcel Proust pela segunda vez... Há quem diga que é comum da parte dos seus leitores iniciarem uma segunda leitura logo após a tortura que é a primeira. Quanto a mim posso dizer que seja esse o caso. Quando li este primeiro volume pela primeira vez decidi que não tinha interesse em ler os outros seis, mas depois mudei de ideias e li-os. Mas li quase como que só para poder dizer ter lido. Então o objetivo seria não mais pensar no livro mas isso afigurou-se estranhamente impossível. Surgia uma crescente curiosidade em ler sínteses ou resumos e ficava-me sempre aquela surpresa depois de ler sobre um acontecimento do qual já não tinha memória. Por isso é que me proponho agora a uma segunda e muito, muito mais demorada leitura, para que possa compreender o livro pelo menos o suficiente para dizer qualquer coisa interessante sobre ele. Em relação ao título deste artigo, do qual planeio fazer uma série, decidi usar o termo que usei porque nenhum outro me pareceu mais correto. Nã...

A Minha Interpretação Pessoal de “Sou um Guardador de Rebanhos” de Alberto Caeiro

Em continuação com o meu artigo anterior, comprometo-me agora a uma interpretação de um outro poema do mesmo poeta... mais ou menos. Porque os vários heterónimos pessoanos são todos iguais e diferentes, e diferentes e iguais. Qualquer leitor encontra temas recorrentes nos vários poemas porque de certa forma todos estes poetas se propuseram a resolver as mesmas questões que tanto atormentavam o poeta original. Mas a solução encontrada por Alberto Caeiro é algo diferente na medida em que é quase invejável ao próprio Fernando Pessoa, ainda que talvez não seja invejável aos outros heterónimos. Por outro lado, talvez eu esteja a projetar porque em tempos esta poesia foi deveras invejável para mim. Ao contrário do poema anterior, do qual nem sequer tinha memória de ter lido e apenas sei que o li porque anotei marcas e sublinhados na margem da página, este poema é um que li, que gostei e que apresentei numa aula qualquer num dia que me vem agora à memória como idílico. Mas em típico estilo d...

The Gospel According to Dragline

Yeah, well... sometimes the Gospel can be a real cool book. I'm of course referencing the 1967 classic Cool Hand Luke, one of my favorite films of all time. And, as it is often the case with me, this is a film I didn't really care for upon first viewing. Now I obviously think differently. In many ways, this is a movie made beautiful by it's simplicity. It is made visually striking by its backdrop of natural southern beauty in the US – the everlasting summer, the seemingly abandoned train tracks and the long dirt roads, almost fully deserted were it not for the prisoners working by the fields... It almost gives off the impression that there is no world beyond that road. And maybe as part of that isolation, the story doesn't shy away from grit. It is dirty, grimy and hence, it is real. Some modern movies seem to have an obsession with polishing every pixel of every frame, thus giving off a distinct sense of falsehood. The movie then becomes too colorful, too vibrant, it...