The speech in question was arguably one of the biggest viral sensations of new atheism. It was certainly one of the clips that gave me a big nudge or two towards my proposition that atheism was a more reasonable position than any form of theism, perhaps it made me believe that atheism was even true, which would denote a positive statement and therefore a stronger claim. And with good reason because this was a damn good speech, it's Richard Dawkins at the height of his powers and with some impressive rhetorical flare to boot. But now that so many years have passed, does this speech still hold up? And now that I've criticized ten arguments in favor of atheism here, and another ten here, do I still hold to the argument that Dawkins presents in this brief speech? I'm not so sure I do, at least not quite in the same way. In a nutshell, I believe that what is being defended here is something somewhat similar to Pascal's wager, an argument that, though kinda weak in philosop...
Tryinta become a writer.